<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flawed grassfed beef study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mossbackfarm.com/2009/01/flawed-grassfed-beef-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mossbackfarm.com/2009/01/flawed-grassfed-beef-study/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:11:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet</title>
		<link>http://www.mossbackfarm.com/2009/01/flawed-grassfed-beef-study/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mossbackfarm.com/chronicles/2009/01/flawed-grassfed-beef-study/#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Hi Rich-
just read this post and the follow-up, plus what&#039;s at OSU&#039;s link. As you note at the start this study is totally irrelevant to determining whether differences exist in preferences for grass- vs corn- fed beef. Interestingly the study&#039;s authors must have known that the study was flawed, since they apparently never published it in a peer-reviewed research journal (or it was rejected)! There are many journals interested in publishing this sort of research so if the authors took the time to conduct an investigation and reported it to the USDA (and the Oregonian) where&#039;s the original paper containing data and methodology?!
-Janet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rich-<br />
just read this post and the follow-up, plus what&#8217;s at OSU&#8217;s link. As you note at the start this study is totally irrelevant to determining whether differences exist in preferences for grass- vs corn- fed beef. Interestingly the study&#8217;s authors must have known that the study was flawed, since they apparently never published it in a peer-reviewed research journal (or it was rejected)! There are many journals interested in publishing this sort of research so if the authors took the time to conduct an investigation and reported it to the USDA (and the Oregonian) where&#8217;s the original paper containing data and methodology?!<br />
-Janet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carri</title>
		<link>http://www.mossbackfarm.com/2009/01/flawed-grassfed-beef-study/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>carri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mossbackfarm.com/chronicles/2009/01/flawed-grassfed-beef-study/#comment-171</guid>
		<description>Hey Rich, this is very interesting.  I heard about this study recently and thought it sounded suspect, but didn&#039;t take the time to look at the research.  Thanks for looking closer than I, and for noting it here!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rich, this is very interesting.  I heard about this study recently and thought it sounded suspect, but didn&#8217;t take the time to look at the research.  Thanks for looking closer than I, and for noting it here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

