If you’re interested in finding out about steer/heifer shares for 2011, please email or call us (503 852 9585) to get on our mailing list. Ordering info will go out in the winter (although we will take share reservations for 2011 at any time starting now).

And thanks to everyone who continues to support our farm!

Thanks!

The spring “Neighborly” beef is from young non-breeding heifers raised by our neighbors who (like us) only feed their animals on pasture and hay, and don’t use antibiotics, hormones, etc.

If you’re interested, please contact us ASAP at 503 852 9585. Orders will be taken on a first come, first served basis.

FYI: We also do have shares left of “Neighborly” heifers for this fall (October). We are sold out of our Premium summer steer shares.

From the article:

Beef from grass-fed animals has lower levels of unhealthy fats and higher levels of omega-3 fatty acids, which are better for cardiovascular health. Grass-fed beef also has lower levels of dietary cholesterol and offers more vitamins A and E as well as antioxidants. The study found that meat from animals raised entirely on grass also had about twice the levels of conjugated linoleic acid, or CLA, isomers, which may have cancer fighting properties and lower the risk of diabetes and other health problems.

The study itself can be found in the latest Nutrition Journal.

This was taken in March 2003 from a ladder near a spot where the laying hens had just moved from.  Note the small green patches to the left of the English Hawthorne in the midground…

and this was taken in Feb 2010 (but without a ladder).  The knee high firs are looking pretty good.

This was from the same spot as before, on the ladder in March 2003, now looking east.

and in Feb 2010

Here’s a shot looking SE, up the “Low Pass” of Old Moore’s valley road

and here’s the shot from Feb 2010 from my guesstimate as to where it was taken. A lot more trees in the valley these days.

and a 50′s-era shot to the south of South Moore’s Valley.

and the closest approximation to the location.

It’s neat to see how a landscape can change, both in under a decade, and then over the decades.

While I’ve been wanting to do this post for a while, what finally sparked me to get it all organized was this article in the local paper by a local historian. The money quote:

Puckerville, in Moore’s Valley area, tried also to become a town. In the late 1880s and ’90s, Puckerville items in Yamhill County newspapers reported talk of a new store “in our berg,” the organizing of a literary society, and this confident item: “Puckerville has more get up and go than any other town its size in Yamhill County.” But Puckerville’s “get up and go” never “got up and grew.”

It looks like my next historical investigation will be finding out where this Puckerville town was. Moore’s Valley is a very small place, so it can’t have been more than a few miles from us, but I haven’t heard anything about a town site around here. Add it to my list…

Scrape together some change and drop them some at the link below.

http://maps.ers.usda.gov/FoodAtlas/

It’s a pretty fascinating tool…pounds of meat consumed per capita per year, access to grocery stores, WIC redemptions (pictured), and farmer’s markets are available down to the county level. We spent a good chunk of the evening playing around with it. It’s a good lead-in to Blog for Food month

Wow. Talk about being divisive. It seems to me that the FB Prez just issued a call to arms (literally?) for Farm Bureau members. Apparently those of us promoting alternative agriculture are now two-faced “adversaries” and “extremists” hell bent on destroying all those nice salt of the earth farm families who are just doing their darned-est to feed the world. Oh yes, and we’re working on our “elitist power grab”. (Because there is so much money and power to be gained through farming…duh!) Oh, and did you catch that we are apparently morally bankrupt because we dare to question whether industrial agriculture methods are really the best way to feed the world?

Of course, the Farm Bureau is doing precisely what they are accusing us of doing: dividing farmers by trying to scare its members into thinking that their way of life is being oppressed by people who are actually on their side.

This reminds me of what happened here in the NW during the collapse of the logging industry. The reality was that logging at current levels was not sustainable, but rather than admit that the system was flawed, it was easier and more convenient to blame environmentalists for the collapse in the timber industry. This “blame the messenger” mentality is useful in setting the stage for the “us vs. them” debate.

“…The days of their elitist power grabs are over.”

Again, Stillman is actually accusing us of something of which his industry is guilty. Big Ag is the “elitist” group… they are the ones who like our ag system the way it is: run by an exclusive group of industry heads and lobbyists, with hardly any money trickling down to the people who actually grow the food. The spirit behind alternative agriculture is actually the opposite of elite: it’s egalitarian (which means that it’s based on a “belief in equal economic, social, political and civil rights for all people”).

No, this labeling of alternative agriculture as “elitist” is simply industrial ag proponents trying to frame the debate. Their frame looks like this: “Alternative ag proponents don’t carry about feeding the hungry… they just want their $8 tomatoes and fancy foods. They don’t care if the price of food is too expensive for some people. We actually care about feeding the poor, and through technology, we can do so.”

As someone in the alternative ag movement, I would frame our position this way: “We want our food to be safe, healthy and nutritious. We want all farmers and farm workers to make a living wage. We want the earth to be utilized in a way that maintains and enhances its ability to produce food indefinitely. We want all people everywhere to have the ability to purchase and/or produce food that is nutritious and affordable.”

Obviously, those sentiments are more egalitarian than elitist. And I’m not sure exactly what power we’re supposedly grabbing? Is it the consumer dollars that are being spent directly on food at farmers’ markets and in CSAs? Are we supposed to feel guilty that so many young people are excited about making a living by growing food and selling that food directly to customers?

“Our adversaries are skillful at taking advantage of our politeness. Publicly, they call for friendly dialogue while privately their tactics are far from that.”

Peronally, I’m unclear about these tactics of which he speaks. Too bad he doesn’t cite any examples. Maybe I’ll try to come up with some…

Let’s see, is it that we’re working with government agencies and non-profits to help low-income families get access to fresh, healthy foods? Is it that we’re speaking out about the epidemic of childhood obesity? Is it that we’re talking about the connections between diet and health? Is it that we’re buying farmland and converting it to organic acreage? Is it that we’re encouraging the increase in the number of local farmers’ markets around the country? Or maybe that we’re forming work groups to talk about how to navigate a bureaucracy with regulations that are based on the industrial ag system? Or that we’re tired of hearing about food recalls every other week? Or perhaps just that we’re here, and we don’t seem to be going away?

Make no mistake… this should not be an “us” vs “them” debate. Alternative ag proponents are on the same side as the farmers, even those in the Farm Bureau. In fact, many of us are farmers. (And some of us are in the Farm Bureau!) And we are all consumers of food.

No, this “you’re either with us or against us” mentality is being promulgated by the Industrial Ag executives and shareholders who feel their bottom line being threatened by the integrity, ingenuity and wisdom of a growing movement of people who want safe and healthy food. Big Ag – and yes, I’m using labels since they fit – wants people to believe that it’s all just about happy chickens and fancy tomatoes for us.

Perhaps we are guilty of a power grab. We do want it all… happy chickens (and cows!), happy consumers, and happy farmers.

Extreme Tree Planting – Trees for Earth from Peter Hill on Vimeo.