<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mossback Farm &#187; flavor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mossbackfarm.com/tag/flavor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mossbackfarm.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:46:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Flawed grassfed beef study</title>
		<link>http://www.mossbackfarm.com/2009/01/flawed-grassfed-beef-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mossbackfarm.com/2009/01/flawed-grassfed-beef-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beef]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farm to school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flavor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to buy grassfed beef]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oregon state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mossbackfarm.com/chronicles/2009/01/flawed-grassfed-beef-study/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently a study was done by Oregon State University to evaluate the appeal and cost effectiveness of bringing grassfed beef into the local school system. This is a great step, and I was excited to see that the effort was being made. Unfortunately, once I dug into the details of the study, I was disappointed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently a study was done by <a href="http://extension.oregonstate.edu/news/story.php?S_No=623&amp;storyType=news">Oregon State University </a>to evaluate the appeal and cost effectiveness of bringing grassfed beef into the local school system.  This is a great step, and I was excited to see that the effort was being made.  Unfortunately, once I dug into the details of the study, I was disappointed to see that they didn&#8217;t actually test for what they claimed</p>
<blockquote><p>The grass-fed beef the students tasted in the surveys came from Portland-based SP Provisions, which processes a brand of beef called Cascade Natural Beef. It&#8217;s made from Angus steers in Oregon and Washington that are <strong>raised on grass, but for the last four months of their lives are fed grain and corn to fatten them up, </strong>said Jim Register, the general manager of the company.</p></blockquote>
<p>This results in an animal that is more expensive to raise, since there&#8217;s the longer time to get to a harvestable weight, which is a result of grassfed production, and then switched to grain, which negates any of the <a href="http://eatwild.com/healthbenefits.htm">health and taste benefits</a> (scroll down) that result from a grassfed and <strong>grass finished</strong> animal.  It essentially takes the weaknesses of both production types, and calls it grassfed.  No wonder it didn&#8217;t work out.</p>
<p>While <a href="http://www.farmtoschool.org/OR/programs.htm">farm to school programs</a> are an excellent way to help farmers and get healthy, local food into our kids, studies such as this one distort the costs and benefits of the program&#8230;hopefully they&#8217;ll get a more robust study underway to really measure the costs and appeal of grassfed meat.</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.cattlenetwork.com/content.asp?contentid=279760">via</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mossbackfarm.com/2009/01/flawed-grassfed-beef-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
